Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	39.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	60%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 69 1-Core 148 2-Core 252 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 761 78% 628 Pts	64-Core 1,184 73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 212 Reflection 200 Parallax 193 173% 202 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 144 Splatting 130 124% 155 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1056 543 597 551 561 530 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 2,386 Write 1,791 Mixed 1,560 SusWrite 640 355% 1594 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 74.4 246% 84.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,275 DQ Write 687 DQ Mixed 988 732% 983 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 355%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 842GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 33 35 34 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 48GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 24.2 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 20.3 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,411x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,235x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16