Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '21 at 14:46
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 176 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 323 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Lighting 94.3 Reflection 89.9 Parallax 78.4 77% 87.5 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 82.4 Splatting 72.6 60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 46 65 55 56 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.9% Very poor	Read 165 Write 104 Mixed 137 SusWrite 50.2 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 3.2 30% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 11.7 DQ Write 18 DQ Mixed 16.4 12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 489GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 20 15 60 52 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 19.4 Write 44.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 33.6 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 68%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 37GB free Firmware: SW100-34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 44 44 43 42 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 41 Write 48.5 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 42.9 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	79x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	76x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	134x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	121x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16