| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 34.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '21 at 10:42 |
| Run Duration | 245 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60%
Above average
|
60% 99.9 Pts
|
35% 274 Pts
|
16% 252 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.88%
Terrible
|
1% 1.03 fps
|
1% 1.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 76 55 50 50 51 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
56% 75.7 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.5%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
45% 88.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,134 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 484x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 203x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 140x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 392x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 97x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |