Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$153
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 253
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 772
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 127
Parallax 132
113% 132 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 109
Splatting 94.9
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 152 229 176 229 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 260
Write 347
Mixed 325
SusWrite 200
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 29
97% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 107
135% 240 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
172GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 465 465 460 460 455 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 236
Mixed 402
SusWrite 462
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 29.9
124% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 291
241% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
490GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 159 160 158 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 155
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
177GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 81 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 79.5
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 61%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
0GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 46.5
71% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
0GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.2
Write 58.8
Mixed 37
63% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 29
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback