Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 146 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 229 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: JPFOA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 29 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 22 Write 24.6 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 27.6 17% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 1x4GB 4,880 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.5 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,189x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	984x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16