Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 02:38
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 785
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 190
Parallax 241
171% 214 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 205
Splatting 166
157% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 153%
Great: 174%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 936 814 807 750 695 687 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,100
Write 2,019
Mixed 877
SusWrite 782
270% 1,195 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 71.3
211% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 1,011
769% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 206%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 26.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback