Lenovo 81DK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81DK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 10:48
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 122
56% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 174
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 3979) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 5.9
2% 4.03 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: LDM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.4
Write 78
Mixed 51
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81DK Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81DK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback