Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 22:52
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 241
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 749
74% 587 Pts
64-Core 935
63% 935 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
119% 144 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 124
Splatting 110
105% 133 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 113%
Great: 127%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 124 120 120 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 465
Mixed 382
SusWrite 153
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.8
191% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 266
200% 266 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 287 288 288 288 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 466
Mixed 401
SusWrite 305
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.3
196% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 328
251% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
303GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 460 461 470 474 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 432
SusWrite 463
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60
197% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 265
212% 300 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
156GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 127 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 147
Write 146
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 125
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 33% 6 62 4 165 27" 2560 1440 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 16,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,719
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $248Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback