| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Acer Aspire M5910 |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110215 |
| Uptime | 4.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 09 '21 at 05:20 |
| Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52%
Above average
|
59% 101 Pts
|
28% 210 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0429) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
12% 18.4 fps
|
12% 14.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 76 45 41 43 88 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
31% 141 MB/s
|
61% 24.8 MB/s
|
52% 100 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
388GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 158 157 153 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
63% 86.4 MB/s
|
103% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 129 137 144 143 136 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
204% 2.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.2%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Acer Aspire M5910
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 68x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 33x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 12x |
| GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples | 9x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 9x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 11x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 9x |
| X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $301 |