PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS |
Memory | 54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150811 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '21 at 08:11 |
Run Duration | 281 Seconds |
Run User | ARE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 45GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
168%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 330 216 188 189 223 MB/s
|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
45GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 353 386 393 388 381 MB/s
|
90.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
87GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 280 299 305 306 300 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
812GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 39 39 38 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 299 316 318 318 317 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples | 24x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 22x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 26x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 21x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $344 |