Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 656
61% 509 Pts
64-Core 3,428
212% 3,428 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 45GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 219
Parallax 244
187% 231 fps
MRender 230
Gravity 241
Splatting 194
179% 222 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 168%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 330 216 188 189 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 434
Mixed 342
SusWrite 248
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 44.1
135% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 344
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
45GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 353 386 393 388 381 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 426
Mixed 317
SusWrite 375
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 32.1
110% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 159
170% 283 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 116%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
87GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 280 299 305 306 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 347
Write 355
Mixed 326
SusWrite 294
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 21.6
72% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 99.9
DQ Mixed 126
88% 110 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
812GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.4% Very poor
Read 39
Write 41.2
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 38
9% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 10.2
33% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 26.6
20% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 299 316 318 318 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 354
Write 352
Mixed 324
SusWrite 311
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 25.2
77% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 164
114% 143 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback