PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7577 |
Motherboard | MSI 790FX-GD70(MS-7577) (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100708 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 24 '17 at 23:50 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
EVGA(3842 6283) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
36.7%
Below average
|
||||
52.8%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 14x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 14x |
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $275 |