Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B360M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 268 26% 212 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Lighting 73.4 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 67.2 60% 72 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 73 Splatting 68.7 57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB 3,189 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.79.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 43 100 59 48 96 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 160 Write 76 Mixed 122 SusWrite 69.2 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 18.7 74% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 82.3 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 69.7 59% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 100GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 99 97 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 167 Write 147 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 97.6 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 17,846 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 8.6 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	305x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	230x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	173x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	80x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	28x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	46x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	43x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $395

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16