Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU_GU502LU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU_GU502LU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LU
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 11:10
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 236
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 789
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 175F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.4
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 175F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 91.6
Parallax 85.6
76% 90.3 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 86
Splatting 75.4
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 108 108 55 55 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 855
Mixed 711
SusWrite 107
152% 686 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 51.4
174% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 77.3
111% 209 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 209%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Read 27
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.2
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
46% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 8.9
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 10.6
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.8
123% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 13%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
861GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 112
132% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU_GU502LU Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU_GU502LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback