Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 429
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2132 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 60.3
42% 60.1 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 65.7
53% 65 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 46%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 541 531 514 504 534 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 1,597
Mixed 790
SusWrite 555
262% 1,178 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 47.7
199% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 831
631% 855 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 203%
Great: 254%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
110GB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 91 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 69.8
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 91.7
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
127GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43% Average
Read 73.2
Write 74.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 76.3
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
433GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 111 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 81.2
Write 24.1
Mixed 44
SusWrite 108
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $736
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback