Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '21 at 11:46
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 75 2-Core 146 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 477 46% 379 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 10 Parallax 8.7 5% 8.33 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 11.9 8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3716 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 132 Parallax 146 99% 133 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 126 Splatting 111 113% 143 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D256 256GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20901 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 101 103 94 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 1,098 Write 38 Mixed 173 SusWrite 105 75% 353 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 29.7 102% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 509 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 132 143% 251 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 224%
Patriot P200 2TB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 365GB free Firmware: H190625 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 6.4 5.7 4 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 423 Write 4.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.8 22% 108 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 107%
USB SG Flash 64GB 264 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 57GB free, PID ef18 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 21 24 21 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 117 Write 24.9 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 22.7 52% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4.8 310% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 19.1 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,019x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	442x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	271x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	761x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16