PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180309 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Nov 03 '21 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
72.9%
Very good
|
78% 133 Pts
|
50% 370 Pts
|
26% 393 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Zotac(19DA 288A) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.63
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
17% 20 fps
|
19% 21.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$89
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 241 240 205 196 173 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
71% 315 MB/s
|
99% 30.3 MB/s
|
148% 221 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
56GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 299 303 295 309 305 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
78% 350 MB/s
|
114% 34.6 MB/s
|
143% 216 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 73 80 95 82 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
49% 66.4 MB/s
|
217% 2.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
432GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 46 51 52 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
41% 55.9 MB/s
|
137% 1.47 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
52.7%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
55% 72.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 26" | 1280 720 | ROW0000 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $300Bench 83%, 588,541 samples | 413x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $215Bench 79%, 351,967 samples | 305x |
Core i5-6500Intel $202Bench 72%, 221,872 samples | 97x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,234,782 samples | 197x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $500Bench 105%, 915,325 samples | 117x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples | 101x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $850 |