Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 146 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 325 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 050E) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.16% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 2 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.1 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.16% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 142 226 224 231 232 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 431 Write 337 Mixed 310 SusWrite 202 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 22.2 117% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 315 230% 303 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3160MP68FAF1600 2x8GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.7% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.4 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 15.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	437x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	131x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	103x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	84x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	41x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 2x4GBSmartBench 43%, 552 samples	35x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16