Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 195 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 476 52% 410 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Graphics 365 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 053E) 1GB Driver: 21.Q2.1 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	7.3% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 12.3 7% 11.5 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 9 Splatting 8.6 7% 9.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.3% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 229 245 244 246 249 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 446 Write 405 Mixed 372 SusWrite 258 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 29.3 94% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 350 262% 349 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	176x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	137x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	86x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	30x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	32x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,654 samples	15x
X7C75G-HYC 2x4GBKingstonBench 58%, 334 samples	11x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16