Performance Results


Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '21 at 14:21
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 80.8 1-Core 133 2-Core 219 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 713 71% 577 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 165 Parallax 172 123% 162 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 160 Splatting 114 106% 131 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 23 9.7 20 19 21 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 143 Write 99.2 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 59.1 21% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 9.9 45% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 14.8 11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 299GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 260 299 273 304 268 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 244 Write 96.9 Mixed 82 SusWrite 280 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 9.6 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 102%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 217GB free Firmware: UG3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 125 58 116 26 159 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 420 Write 318 Mixed 199 SusWrite 86.8 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 17.5 68% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 44.1 42% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16