PC Tracer 2070

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	PC Tracer 2070 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME H310-PLUS
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 268 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 865 83% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,039 64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 2516) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 113 Parallax 128 99% 121 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 122 Splatting 103 107% 135 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 637 Write 180 Mixed 234 76% 350 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 39.5 138% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 427 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 204 168% 250 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 193%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 101GB free Firmware: MU05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 393 Write 262 Mixed 215 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 28.5 109% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 99.5 111% 190 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB 3,261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OAAB0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 173 Write 170 Mixed 28.3 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB 2,836 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.3% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 25.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Tracer 2070 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

System: PC Tracer 2070

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	10x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	5x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	8x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	4x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 512GB512gbBench 185%, 4,059 samples	3x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 74%, 3,467 samples	7x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $433

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16