Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 86.5 1-Core 41 2-Core 67.8 46% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 178 19% 151 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 1.2 2% 3.33 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.9 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 171 130 131 128 131 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.9% Average	Read 233 Write 201 Mixed 210 SusWrite 148 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 17.8 65% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 20.5 57% 119 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF1339.M16F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF1339.M16F 8GBUnknownBench 28%, 3 samples	1x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $320

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16