Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 21:14
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 44.1
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 116
44% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 150
Reflection 11.6
183% 80.6 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 500GB SSD
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 281 311 302 300 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 128
Write 71.5
Mixed 71
SusWrite 296
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 7.8
27% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 14.4
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 89%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
379GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1513 1460 1575 1479 1451 1181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,443
327% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 37.3
123% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 414
316% 429 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 198%
Great: 488%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
276GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 314 335 318 329 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 375
Write 162
Mixed 300
SusWrite 320
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 14.6
56% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 160
128% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 19.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback