Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 858
85% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 110
Splatting 119
95% 116 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 440 438 451 458 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 455
Mixed 346
SusWrite 446
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 42.7
160% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 288
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
134GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 151
Write 94.9
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 95.8
129% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
159GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 42 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 42.3
52% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C14-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZKY F4-3200C14-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZKY 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback