| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B150M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160630 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 25 '21 at 02:54 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
68% 118 Pts
|
44% 331 Pts
|
21% 334 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.2%
Below average
|
35% 47.4 fps
|
30% 36.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 225 96 4.8 44 52 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
49% 222 MB/s
|
29% 7.9 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
507GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 143 148 141 142 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
218% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.2%
Good
|
70% 24.5 GB/s
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
51% 77.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M Pro4 Builds (Compare 373 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B150M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 84x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 69x |
| Core i5-6600Intel $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $283 |