Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.15%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario BT473AA-ABA CQ5604F (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA5
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100520
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II 170u 406 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Memory 11.7 1-Core 9.6 2-Core 14.4 8% 11.9 Pts	4-Core 14.9 8-Core 17.4 2% 16.1 Pts	64-Core 24.5 2% 24.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 2A6C) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 791GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 11 7.7 34 41 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 134 Write 107 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 27.7 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 10 15 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 13.3 Write 15.3 Mixed 13 SusWrite 15.4 20% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.8 GB/s	Latency 388 10% 388 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16