Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$236
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 213
83% 140 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 585
64% 496 Pts
64-Core 588
40% 588 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
MSI(1462 8A9E) 2GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
7.75% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 11.1
7% 9.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 9.5
9% 9.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.75%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 308 317 300 319 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 487
Mixed 400
SusWrite 326
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.9
212% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 345
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$25
466GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 93
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 95
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 9.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 19.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 19.1
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.1
198% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 SAM027E SyncMaster
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $248Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback