Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '21 at 08:17
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 64.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 288 88% 166 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 987 91% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,547 96% 1,547 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.8% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 115 Parallax 100 87% 107 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 92.4 Splatting 87.8 81% 100 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 402 213 141 117 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,494 Write 1,500 Mixed 1,175 SusWrite 286 249% 1,114 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 62.5 207% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 931 DQ Write 577 DQ Mixed 740 555% 749 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 237%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 419GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 458 469 473 449 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 451 Mixed 455 SusWrite 430 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 50.6 167% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 354 268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GD3200C16K2E 2x16GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 18.2 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 17.3 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	775x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	240x
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	223x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	218x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	208x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	181x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	115x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	77x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	63x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $573

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16