Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 127
58% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 362
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1684 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 130
Parallax 116
100% 123 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 115
Splatting 105
90% 111 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdsr 250GB 250GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 191 63 36 32 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 388
Write 274
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 107
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
994GB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 276 344 353 360 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 396
Write 361
Mixed 338
SusWrite 323
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 35.7
115% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 175
126% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 178 179 151 177 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
658GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 133 133 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 119
Mixed 41
SusWrite 128
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
148% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
238GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 76 78 78 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44% Average
Read 76.1
Write 79.8
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 77.1
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback