Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 08:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 526
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 679
42% 679 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 70
Parallax 8.8
5% 28.4 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.8
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,096
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,212
293% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 50
177% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 514
386% 521 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback