Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer LY310
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 89%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 199
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 405
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 4767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (137 fps cap detected)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 138
Parallax 137
112% 137 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 128
Splatting 119
104% 128 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 107%
Great: 158%
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1A58 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 974 765 821 862 891 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 844
Write 820
Mixed 687
SusWrite 873
182% 806 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 90.4
298% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 754
568% 769 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 214%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback