Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81 13,306 User benchmarks, average bench 40% FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 113 57% 89.7 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 116 16% 116 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.2% Above average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 61.5 50% 60 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 62.1 Splatting 55.2 50% 62 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 232 Write 164 Mixed 162 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 20.9 74% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 124 95% 131 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 102%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 162GB free Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 174 132 138 146 117 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 243 Write 217 Mixed 176 SusWrite 143 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 7.3 55% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 42.7 DQ Mixed 23.2 30% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 55%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 211GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 36 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 62.9 Write 64.7 Mixed 52.4 SusWrite 35.7 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.4% Poor	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 9 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	13x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 500 samples	4x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	3x
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBUnknownBench 33%, 442 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16