ECT A_M_I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z97-HD3
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 397 49% 374 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 54.5 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 58.3 44% 59.8 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 51.6 47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 468 Write 450 Mixed 308 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 52 180% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 309 247% 346 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 269GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 133 133 132 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 131 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 107%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 105 102 104 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 95.6 Write 96.9 Mixed 57 SusWrite 102 119% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	60.6% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 19.2 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: ECT A_M_I

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	32x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
CM3B8G2C1600L11 2x8GBCorsairBench 56%, 507 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 8,984 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16