Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '21 at 16:35
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 168 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 326 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 102 Parallax 105 87% 105 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 95 Splatting 88.1 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 244 262 216 215 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Read 280 Write 324 Mixed 270 SusWrite 236 63% 277 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 29.9 95% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 33.6 DQ Write 74.9 DQ Mixed 44.3 37% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 124%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 13GB free Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 77 51 92 65 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 354 Write 190 Mixed 222 SusWrite 70.5 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 14.5 79% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 16 27% 49 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.1% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16