Toshiba Satellite M200

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite M200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel SANTA ROSA CRB
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071220
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 18.8 2-Core 32.8 30% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 30.6 8-Core 33.3 4% 32 Pts	64-Core 36.4 2% 36.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF10) 128MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.53 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0240A 240GB 2,348 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 85 140 79 62 30 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.3% Average	Read 229 Write 182 Mixed 198 SusWrite 82.2 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 22.3 82% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 12.3 23% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 144GB free Firmware: 01.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 26 25 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 25.7 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 25.4 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 43%
JMicron Generic 500GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 195GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 23 24 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 15.5 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 23.7 28% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite M200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite M200

CPU
Core2 Duo T5450Intel $89Bench 31%, 1,321 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples	1x

SSD
TA1D0240A 240GBGalaxBench 69%, 2,348 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16