Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 192 63% 113 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 354 44% 336 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 64 51 54 61 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 427 Write 389 Mixed 358 SusWrite 79.3 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 46.2 161% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 201 192% 303 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 117%
ADATA HD710 PRO 2TB 905 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID a75a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 22 19 21 25 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 94.4 Write 89.5 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 26.8 87% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.2 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	34x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	9x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $424

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16