Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 89.8 1-Core 140 2-Core 278 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 750 81% 645 Pts	64-Core 744 46% 744 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 1457) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.7% Average	Lighting 56.4 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 50.5 46% 55.3 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 48 42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 50%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 505 Write 479 Mixed 461 108% 482 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 62.4 214% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 355 267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 19,779 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 20.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	618x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	599x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	499x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	399x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	372x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	179x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $548

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16