Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UAR
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 05:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 535
62% 483 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1311) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 441 424 421 426 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 363
Mixed 307
SusWrite 426
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 42.8
150% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback