| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF GAMING B550-PLUS |
| Memory | 22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20210713 |
| Uptime | 2.3 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 17 '21 at 20:38 |
| Run Duration | 365 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
88% 167 Pts
|
82% 666 Pts
|
65% 1,047 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
30% 38.1 fps
|
27% 33.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 277 277 280 279 281 MB/s
|
188%
Outstanding
|
203% 910 MB/s
|
272% 96.3 MB/s
|
308% 546 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
390GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 13 12 16 15 MB/s
|
23.1%
Poor
|
21% 29 MB/s
|
44% 0.3 MB/s
| |
|
|
2,064% 2,889 MB/s
|
7,000% 56 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62.8%
Good
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
59% 20.8 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,718 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 75x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $650 |