Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

Gaming 115%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 116%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D881F
Memory27.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 18:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 719
64% 541 Pts
64-Core 1,301
80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Palit(1569 2484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 198
Parallax 190
183% 204 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 153
Splatting 138
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 198 197 207 197 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 250
Write 229
Mixed 217
SusWrite 204
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 34
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 159
130% 184 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 81.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 87.5
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 98%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
9GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 24.7
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 25.8
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 25%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 25%

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback