Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510QA
Memory	8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 108 47% 77.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 165 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 1931) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 11.7 6% 9.4 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 7.6 6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 351 344 349 369 378 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 441 Write 344 Mixed 362 SusWrite 354 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 23.6 91% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 48.3 90% 178 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.8 7.2 2.9 7.9 9.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 4.3 Write 15.5 SusWrite 6 12% 8.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 76.B305G.D500B Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	3x
A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 6,180 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	3x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	2x
76.B305G.D500B Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBApacerBench 24%, 19 samples	1x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBSamsungBench 62%, 48 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16