Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 01:17
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 46
2-Core 91.7
47% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 179
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.2% Below average
Lighting 49.5
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 60.3
40% 48.2 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 25.1
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 69 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.7% Above average
Read 234
Write 223
Mixed 213
SusWrite 60
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 41.9
137% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 54.7
44% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
77GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.7% Good
Read 238
Write 196
Mixed 206
SusWrite 72.6
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 41.2
144% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 98.2
DQ Mixed 52.9
46% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
608GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 98.1
Write 100
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 72.5
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
255GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 65.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 61
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback