Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '21 at 23:04
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 89.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1,013 95% 791 Pts	64-Core 1,617 100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 9.1 5% 8.47 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 0.2 4% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 152 Parallax 141 142% 156 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 140 Splatting 125 120% 151 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 599 600 580 601 601 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 2,308 Write 2,269 Mixed 1,525 SusWrite 609 375% 1,678 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 77 259% 90.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1133 DQ Write 844 DQ Mixed 967 729% 981 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 881GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 136 128 137 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 116 Write 159 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 133 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 106%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 896GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 37 40 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x8GB 3,565 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21.8 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,076x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	680x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	310x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	413x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	320x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	265x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,560

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16