Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 27 days ago, 23 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 21:05
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$316
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 258
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 967
92% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,439
97% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
162% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 215
Parallax 225
185% 223 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 162
Splatting 143
134% 166 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 162%
Great: 167%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 1TB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s72
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1014 971 1127 830 1023 1128 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 1,018
Mixed 824
SusWrite 1,016
248% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 49.4
190% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 319
288% 416 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 205%
Great: 233%
Viper M.2 VPN100 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2101 1252 995 819 925 997 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 579
Write 849
Mixed 443
SusWrite 1,182
174% 763 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 21.4
124% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 73.2
174% 336 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 152%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 210 194 203 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.5
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 9,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback