Asus ROG STRIX H470-I GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX H470-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-10500-$246
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 260
94% 163 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 815
82% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,046
70% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$465
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 84.5
Reflection 84
Parallax 80
68% 82.8 fps
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 64.3
81% 71.6 fps
Poor: 56% Great: 64%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 864 860 868 868 865 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,280
Write 2,014
Mixed 1,306
SusWrite 933
365% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 81.5
267% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 810
610% 819 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 268%
Great: 330%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
339GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2103 2217 1097 1108 1107 1105 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,339
Write 2,106
Mixed 1061
SusWrite 1,456
389% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 76.7
250% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 916
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 849
635% 847 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 298%
Great: 359%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
191GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 102 127 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 464
Write 328
Mixed 342
SusWrite 135
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 31.6
126% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 204
183% 276 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 89%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
229GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 221 211 222 221 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 472
Mixed 362
SusWrite 243
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 43.5
149% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 262
220% 319 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 79.1
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 95.9
66% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$120
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 24.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 27.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 33: 3R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 11% 81 244 98 60 7.2" 1920 1080 SAM0669 SAMSUNG
History: Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 38: 4R 6G 0B | Score 33: 3R 6G 0B
Typical ROG STRIX H470-I GAMING Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H470-I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback