HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180815
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 162
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 451
44% 363 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 69.6
35% 57.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 40.7
41% 51 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 24 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 3,416
Write 29.7
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 27.6
184% 884 MB/s
4K Read 249
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.5
385% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 240%
Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
182GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 108 105 73 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 159
Write 148
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 93.9
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 107%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
52GB free, PID 0cc7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.6
Write 8.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.9
9% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 28
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback