Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3-605 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3-605
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130702
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 187 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 356 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 41 Parallax 38.4 30% 38.8 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.6 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH060GMCT 60GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTCAN102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,824 Write 34.3 Mixed 64 272% 1,307 MB/s	4K Read 486 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.1 744% 164 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 92%
Intenso Sata III 240GB 2,859 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 21GB free Firmware: T0529A1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 484 Write 419 Mixed 399 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 20.6 113% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 29.9 79% 161 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 20GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 110 129 120 125 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 112 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 2x4GB 688 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.2% Above average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.9 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	499x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	456x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	219x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	165x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	140x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	129x

SSD
IT LMT-256L9M 256GBLiteonBench 85%, 561 samples	80x
IT LMT-128L9M 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 1,236 samples	64x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	101x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	87x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16