bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

System
Motherboard	Intel DZ77GA-70K
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130521
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$267 158,723 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 78% 131 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 507 56% 435 Pts	64-Core 523 35% 523 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$138 1,188,482 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.1% Very good	Lighting 95.8 Reflection 107 Parallax 96.4 77% 99.8 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 95 Splatting 95.7 77% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$400 11,739 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 84 84 83 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 380 Write 192 Mixed 244 SusWrite 89.8 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 32.7 107% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 122 144% 253 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,918 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 103GB free Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 225 206 186 172 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.4% Above average	Read 263 Write 208 Mixed 147 SusWrite 206 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 21.5 80% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 97.5 DQ Mixed 53.5 54% 87 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 92%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,918 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 89GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 224 226 227 227 229 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.6% Above average	Read 203 Write 166 Mixed 135 SusWrite 226 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 23.5 88% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 40.3 67% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 92%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160 732,014 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 389GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 296 60 42 36 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 389 Write 340 Mixed 333 SusWrite 134 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 25.1 83% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 139 103% 136 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 134%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,667 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 117 116 115 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 109 Write 98 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 115 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 72%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 750GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 295GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 38.2 Write 38.3 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 39 53% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 14.7 1,092% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 15.4 1,293% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 21%
Intenso Ultra Line 252GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 209GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 150 Write 130 Mixed 60.8 136% 114 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.8 204% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,810 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 19 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	30	72.3"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 46,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 75%, 251,027 samples	3,029x
Core i7-2600Intel $203Bench 72%, 171,404 samples	2,590x
Core i5-2400Intel $20Bench 69%, 152,767 samples	1,787x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 129,806 samples	2,393x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 914,197 samples	1,962x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 134,947 samples	1,460x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $30Bench 67%, 350,735 samples	1,563x
A400 120GBKingston $24Bench 59%, 134,217 samples	848x
Virtual NVMe Disk 275GBParallelsBench 186%, 1,178 samples	680x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 419,875 samples	1,698x
4x2GBUnknownBench 24%, 184,729 samples	1,149x
1x4GBUnknownBench 26%, 153,760 samples	686x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $327

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $198	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $246	Nvidia RTX 3080 $700	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $20	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16