Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 03:40
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%
CPU Throttled	33%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 31.5 26% 35.5 Pts	4-Core 40.8 8-Core 43.4 6% 42.1 Pts	64-Core 46 3% 46 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 2.48 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4199 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5079 (B1) Unknown 98 98 72 (B3) Unknown 92 92 498 (B4) Unknown 92 92 6030 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 48 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16391531561	43.5% Average	Read 458 Write 231 Mixed 293 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 7.05 35% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 5.96 7% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	35x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	23x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	58x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	18x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	10x
U100 SMG2 126GBSandiskBench 32%, 318 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5674BM0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 44%, 279 samples	20x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	13x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16