Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 135
58% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 395
38% 315 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 83.3
73% 87.3 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 72.8
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 283 288 287 290 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 272
Write 293
Mixed 214
SusWrite 278
60% 264 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 28
97% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 33.9
30% 43 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
581GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 169 172 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 168
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 167
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.9 9.6 8.8 9.3 9.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 7.2
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 9.2
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback