Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$200
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 155
71% 114 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 259
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 260
18% 260 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
2% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 36 35 31 26 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 478
Mixed 368
SusWrite 75.3
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 49.8
174% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 232
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$50
39GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 74 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89.5
Write 87.2
Mixed 56
SusWrite 72
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
18GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 39
Write 40.8
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 41.3
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 7
648% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 7.6
671% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 112%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
10GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 18 18 12 19 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 7.7
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 15.7
23% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
48% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905402-528.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 22" 1280 720 SAM027F SyncMaster
Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 1,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $437

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $776
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback